Dear friends
I have had many encouraging responses to earlier emails and
as a result I am now being asked by many people world wide,
exactly how the UK are responding to the F5J-FAI-CIAM proposals.
I think it is therefore best to let you have the exact wording
in case you are asked the same question by the electric thermal
soaring enthusiasts in your country.
Best regards
Martin Bell - UK eSoaring.
*****************
UK enthusiasts have discussed the F5J rule proposal with our
F5 SC member. He has represented our views by sending the
proposal below to the other members of the committee for discussion
on the 16th April. Please lobby your representatives to ensure
that the setting up of a working group gets support. Please
copy all supporting emails to me. I will forward them to Mike
and George so that your feeling will be conveyed to CIAM.
*****************
Hello all,
I propose that we withdraw our F5J rules proposal and set
up a working group to revise them for 2011. At least we should
discuss this option at our meeting on the 16th April. Mike
Proctor of the UK will be in Lausanne and would like to give
us a short presentation of the work which has been done in
the UK resulting in the BMFA rules. These rules have proved
very popular and in 2009 the UK held 18 competitions to the
BMFA rules, organised in four leagues (one in Scotland, three
in England) with five active contest directors and a total
of 83 participants. 29 competitions are scheduled for 2010.
But this is not confined to the UK. One essential difference
between the BMFA rules and our proposal is the use of a height
limiter rather than an energy limiter. This was invented in
Slovakia where the competition is very popular and has spread
to many other countries. Another essential difference is Man-on-Man
slot based scoring. This has been greatly eased recently by
the advent of 2.4GHz. There was an International event in
2009 and several are planned for 2010. Mike will give us collected
data on the global reach and interest.
I think we, as F5, should embrace this new event/technology
and give it our support as F5J. They really would like the
title F5J as it expresses clearly the message, F3J with electric
propulsion. I fear that if we put a competing set of energy
limited rules in the rule book it will remain a dead letter.
By alienating the community we risk reducing the support for
F5B whereas if we embrace it there will be people who like
more speed and will cross over. This has already happened
in the UK.
There are strong feelings about this in the Electric Soaring
community. I see no downside to setting up a working group.
So please let us listen carefully to what Mike has to say
before making a decision.
George.